Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Manon Peral vs Maria Tanasescu Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Peral vs Tanasescu analysis and find out who is favored!
Manon Peral vs Maria Tanasescu Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Peral 1 - 0 Tanasescu
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Peral has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Tanasescu has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Peral, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Tanasescu has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Peral has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Tanasescu has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Peral has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Tanasescu winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Peral has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 55% (W/L 65/ 54), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 38% (W/L 5/ 8). Tanasescu has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 55% (W/L 18/ 15), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 11% (W/L 1/ 8).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Peral winning 1 times and Tanasescu being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Peral winning 2 and Tanasescu winning 0. The last match between Peral and Tanasescu was at the W15 Monastir, 13-02-2019, Q3, Hard with Manon Peral getting the victory 6-3 6-2.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Peral and Tanasescu have played a deciding set 0 times, with Peral winning 0 times and Tanasescu 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Peral winning 0, and Tanasescu 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Peral has played against opponents with an average rank of while Tanasescu has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Peral has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Tanasescu has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Peral has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Tanasescu has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Ret.
Rank
839
High
30
Age
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
High
23
Age
Plays
W
L
W
L
L
W
L
W
W
L
Form
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
53% (83-75)
Career Total W/L
45% (30-37)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Manon Peral | Maria Tanasescu |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 5 |
| Aces (Total) | 0 | 0 |
| DFs (Total) | 0 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 0:0:0 | 0:0:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Points W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 6-2 | |||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Manon Peral | Maria Tanasescu |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Manon Peral Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats 
Chiraz Bechri
Player
Manon Peral
68%
(
67 of
99)
1st Serve %
70%
(
69 of
99)
1
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
6
55%
(
37 of
67)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
36 of
69)
47%
(
15 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
67%
(
8 of
12)
Break Points Won
54%
(
7 of
13)
47%
(
47 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
50 of
99)
102
Total Points Won
96
|
3-6 7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Manon Peral
Player
Ines Nicault
75%
(
51 of
68)
1st Serve %
62%
(
37 of
60)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
63%
(
32 of
51)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
23 of
37)
41%
(
7 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
43%
(
29 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
28 of
60)
67
Total Points Won
61
|
7-6(5) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF | 6-3 6-2 | H2H | |||
| QF | 6-2 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-0 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats
Margot Yerolymos
Player
Manon Peral
55%
(
27 of
49)
1st Serve %
50%
(
31 of
62)
0
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
7
81%
(
22 of
27)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
19 of
31)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
14 of
31)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
31%
(
15 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
29 of
62)
63
Total Points Won
48
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Marie Temin
Player
Manon Peral
55%
(
41 of
74)
1st Serve %
59%
(
37 of
63)
5
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
4
85%
(
35 of
41)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
23 of
37)
48%
(
16 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
31%
(
23 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
27 of
63)
78
Total Points Won
59
|
6-1 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Manon Peral
Player
Chanel Janssen
64%
(
30 of
47)
1st Serve %
67%
(
30 of
45)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
4
67%
(
20 of
30)
1st Serve Won
33%
(
10 of
30)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
36%
(
17 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
30 of
45)
60
Total Points Won
32
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Federica Arcidiacono
Player
Manon Peral
69%
(
49 of
71)
1st Serve %
73%
(
49 of
67)
0
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
51%
(
25 of
49)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
26 of
49)
64%
(
14 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
45%
(
32 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
33 of
67)
72
Total Points Won
66
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Manon Peral
Player
Thais Castiglioni
82%
(
32 of
39)
1st Serve %
72%
(
28 of
39)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
1
78%
(
25 of
32)
1st Serve Won
32%
(
9 of
28)
29%
(
2 of
7)
2nd Serve Won
18%
(
2 of
11)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
31%
(
12 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
72%
(
28 of
39)
55
Total Points Won
23
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Maria Tanasescu Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Ines Ibbou
Player
Maria Tanasescu
82%
(
36 of
44)
1st Serve %
65%
(
31 of
48)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
6
58%
(
21 of
36)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
12 of
31)
88%
(
7 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
4 of
17)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
36%
(
16 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
32 of
48)
60
Total Points Won
32
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Kathleen Kanev
Player
Maria Tanasescu
74%
(
67 of
91)
1st Serve %
72%
(
86 of
120)
0
Aces
2
8
Double Faults
10
72%
(
48 of
67)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
51 of
86)
21%
(
5 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
14 of
34)
29%
(
5 of
17)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
42%
(
38 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
55 of
120)
108
Total Points Won
103
|
6-3 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Rita Atik
Player
Maria Tanasescu
70%
(
40 of
57)
1st Serve %
59%
(
23 of
39)
-
Aces
-
5
Double Faults
8
68%
(
27 of
40)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
19%
(
3 of
16)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
39%
(
22 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
26 of
39)
61
Total Points Won
35
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Shalimar Talbi
Player
Maria Tanasescu
68%
(
27 of
40)
1st Serve %
51%
(
31 of
61)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
8
81%
(
22 of
27)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
15 of
31)
38%
(
5 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
10 of
30)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
33%
(
13 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
36 of
61)
63
Total Points Won
38
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Maribella Zamarripa
Player
Maria Tanasescu
68%
(
23 of
34)
1st Serve %
54%
(
26 of
48)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
78%
(
18 of
23)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
64%
(
7 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
26%
(
9 of
34)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
31 of
48)
56
Total Points Won
26
|
6-0 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mara Schmidt
Player
Maria Tanasescu
50%
(
53 of
106)
1st Serve %
69%
(
70 of
102)
1
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
4
55%
(
29 of
53)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
34 of
70)
45%
(
24 of
53)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
62%
(
8 of
13)
Break Points Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
50%
(
53 of
106)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
51 of
102)
104
Total Points Won
104
|
4-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Naomi Broady
Player
Maria Tanasescu
64%
(
29 of
45)
1st Serve %
58%
(
26 of
45)
6
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
76%
(
22 of
29)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
10 of
19)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
27%
(
12 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
24 of
45)
57
Total Points Won
33
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Kennedy Shaffer
Player
Maria Tanasescu
47%
(
27 of
57)
1st Serve %
68%
(
44 of
65)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
67%
(
18 of
27)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
24 of
44)
63%
(
19 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
12 of
21)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
35%
(
20 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
29 of
65)
66
Total Points Won
56
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Bojana Klincov
Player
Maria Tanasescu
52%
(
25 of
48)
1st Serve %
58%
(
34 of
59)
1
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
3
76%
(
19 of
25)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
15 of
34)
43%
(
10 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
40%
(
19 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
34 of
59)
63
Total Points Won
44
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Szabina Szlavikovics
Player
Maria Tanasescu
78%
(
29 of
37)
1st Serve %
61%
(
28 of
46)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
1
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
38%
(
3 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
30%
(
11 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
28 of
46)
54
Total Points Won
29
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
view more
Peral Vs Tanasescu Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
